A prophecy fulfilled (almost)
Allow me, please, to bring attention to a pair of developments in the newspaper industry. If you catch a small whiff of self-congratulation in this, I will not make false protest. I’m feeling like Cassandra.
You may recall that a couple of week ago I predicted that an American newspaper somewhere would soon abandon its Monday edition, being the first to break the taboo that daily publication is sacrosanct. Over the weekend, the News Sentinel in Knoxville, Tenn., announced that its Monday paper will be reduced to a “quick-read edition” consisting of two sections: A news section and a sports section, along with whatever classified advertising the paper has bamboozled from people who haven’t heard about Craigslist.
It’s not the total abandonment of Monday that I predicted, but it’s a big step toward it. Look for other newspapers to similarly reduce their already shrunken Monday editions.
Further back in the past — early September, to be specific — I found myself on North Carolina Pubic Radio discussing the ailments of the newspaper business. At one point, I lamented that cuts in staff and the speeded-up news cycle had undermined those richly detailed, compelling stories that are the primary strength of newspapers: “They’re caught up in the speed and the immediacy, and what’s being sacrificed is that overarching narrative that comes along with any story, with any article. And sadly, a lot of people who are good at that are no longer in the newspaper business.”
A piece in the New York Times two days ago struck the same note, explaining how the departures of experienced, capable journalists from their newspapers (either through layoffs or buyouts) have only further eroded the industry’s ability to maintain and expand its audience:
It is not the young fresh faces that are getting whacked — they come cheap — but the most experienced, proven people in the room, the equivalent of the sales clerk who could walk you through a thicket of widescreen television choices to the one that actually works for you. …
Having missed the implications of the Web and allowed both their content and their audience to be scraped away by aggregators and ad networks, newspapers are now working furiously to maintain audience, build new ad models and renovate presentation. But they won’t stay relevant to readers with generic content ginned up by newbies with no background in the communities they serve.
There are wounds that are inflicted upon you, and wounds you inflict upon yourself. The newspaper industry these days has an abundance of both.
November 18th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Those of us who are sustained by well grown words will always look for those who farm them.
November 18th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
How droll.
November 18th, 2008 at 6:36 pm
told ya!
i can’t believe it took this long for someone to kill the monday edition. will the n&o be far behind?
November 18th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
In the future, all newspapers might become “outlines” of news and current events delivered a few times a week.
With 24/7 cable where you get the news as soon as someone lifts an eyebrow the wrong way, it’s impossible for the print media to compete with nanosecond delivery.
I still enjoy the print edition; however, it’s just so easy to skim the news online or keep cable news within earshot that I’m afraid there is no going back.
As I’ve said before, I think newspaper organizations should put their revenue into website news and do a print edition just a few times a week.
November 20th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Monday edition nixing already started, back in the early summer, down in SC:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003806041