<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At least Hagan is consistent</title>
	<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Debrah</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5385</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5385</guid>
					<description>John Drescher has a good column on this subject today.


http://www.newsobserver.com/2711/story/1295578.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Drescher has a good column on this subject today.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/2711/story/1295578.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.newsobserver.com/2711/story/1295578.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brunette</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5381</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5381</guid>
					<description>C'mon, Dan, buck up.  Hagan's lawsuit wasn't &quot;stupid.&quot;  She's not stupid and you know she's not stupid.  Nor was it &quot;craven.&quot;   Hagan is certainly not craven and, again, you do know better.  

It was a tit-for-tat and a wee bit more.  Far from stupid, this not uncommon maneuver helped feed the story about Dole's idiocy (smart) and no, it didn't clog the court system.  It was a piece of paper that got filed and stamped and trhat was it. 

No docket crowded, no bodies in the courthouse, no &quot;crowding&quot; a thing.  

Ya have to know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, Dan, buck up.  Hagan&#8217;s lawsuit wasn&#8217;t &#8220;stupid.&#8221;  She&#8217;s not stupid and you know she&#8217;s not stupid.  Nor was it &#8220;craven.&#8221;   Hagan is certainly not craven and, again, you do know better.  </p>
<p>It was a tit-for-tat and a wee bit more.  Far from stupid, this not uncommon maneuver helped feed the story about Dole&#8217;s idiocy (smart) and no, it didn&#8217;t clog the court system.  It was a piece of paper that got filed and stamped and trhat was it. </p>
<p>No docket crowded, no bodies in the courthouse, no &#8220;crowding&#8221; a thing.  </p>
<p>Ya have to know better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Debrah</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5373</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5373</guid>
					<description>I'd certainly not object to &quot;guild by association&quot;.

I'm in the market for a rich man.

LOL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d certainly not object to &#8220;guild by association&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the market for a rich man.</p>
<p>LOL!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.D. Gearino</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5372</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5372</guid>
					<description>Lee: Actually, the total time I've spent listening to Rush Limbaugh since he hit the air is about five minutes. Also, I've voted for more Democrats in my life than Republicans.

And in a web post on election day, I said this about the offending ad: &quot;Sen. Elizabeth Dole’s campaign commercial focused on opponent Kay Hagan’s 'godless' money was about as low as it got this election season. It was both stupid and clumsy, and may well have cost Dole the election.&quot;

Get your politics out of the way and focus on the point of my column, which was that the court system isn't the appropriate place to sort out partisan squabbles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee: Actually, the total time I&#8217;ve spent listening to Rush Limbaugh since he hit the air is about five minutes. Also, I&#8217;ve voted for more Democrats in my life than Republicans.</p>
<p>And in a web post on election day, I said this about the offending ad: &#8220;Sen. Elizabeth Dole’s campaign commercial focused on opponent Kay Hagan’s &#8216;godless&#8217; money was about as low as it got this election season. It was both stupid and clumsy, and may well have cost Dole the election.&#8221;</p>
<p>Get your politics out of the way and focus on the point of my column, which was that the court system isn&#8217;t the appropriate place to sort out partisan squabbles.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5369</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5369</guid>
					<description>Heavily armed with your daily Rush Limbaugh talking points maybe. It was Dole's poor choice in running the ads in the first place that cost her votes. It was maintaining that there was nothing wrong with the ads that cost her the election. Now, Republican die-hard apologists like you want to point fingers and call names.

The implication of the original Dole add was unmistakable. The female voice at the end of the commercial was meant to make the viewer believe Hagen had made the statement, &quot;there is no God.&quot; Was that slanderous? Probably not. Did it defame her character? Absolutely.

If Republicans want to pursue the game of &quot;Guild by Association&quot; they should probably take a long hard look into their own backgrounds. The list of questionable associations is just as damning as those of any Democrat. A better idea would be to get honest and admit that one can associate with people they disagree with and not accept their positions or philosophies. For example, I have several friends who are Republicans, and I'm still a nice guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heavily armed with your daily Rush Limbaugh talking points maybe. It was Dole&#8217;s poor choice in running the ads in the first place that cost her votes. It was maintaining that there was nothing wrong with the ads that cost her the election. Now, Republican die-hard apologists like you want to point fingers and call names.</p>
<p>The implication of the original Dole add was unmistakable. The female voice at the end of the commercial was meant to make the viewer believe Hagen had made the statement, &#8220;there is no God.&#8221; Was that slanderous? Probably not. Did it defame her character? Absolutely.</p>
<p>If Republicans want to pursue the game of &#8220;Guild by Association&#8221; they should probably take a long hard look into their own backgrounds. The list of questionable associations is just as damning as those of any Democrat. A better idea would be to get honest and admit that one can associate with people they disagree with and not accept their positions or philosophies. For example, I have several friends who are Republicans, and I&#8217;m still a nice guy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.D. Gearino</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5368</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5368</guid>
					<description>Yes, BP, in many ways I'm a wide-eyed, innocent lamb, dismayed by all I see and vulnerable to the horrors of the world. Good thing I'm heavily armed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, BP, in many ways I&#8217;m a wide-eyed, innocent lamb, dismayed by all I see and vulnerable to the horrors of the world. Good thing I&#8217;m heavily armed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Debrah</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5367</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5367</guid>
					<description>Dan is a provocateur.

He just provides the bait.

Frankly, I don't know which one is the more oleaginous, Hagan or Dole.

And I don't know which episode was more nauseating and smarmy, Dole's ridiculous ad or Hagan coming out to tell everyone that she is a &quot;Sunday school teacher&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan is a provocateur.</p>
<p>He just provides the bait.</p>
<p>Frankly, I don&#8217;t know which one is the more oleaginous, Hagan or Dole.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t know which episode was more nauseating and smarmy, Dole&#8217;s ridiculous ad or Hagan coming out to tell everyone that she is a &#8220;Sunday school teacher&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BP</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5365</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/11/14/at-least-hagan-is-consistent/#comment-5365</guid>
					<description>Dan, I'm amazed that a person of your...um...experience still apparently holds out some hope that politicians have some boundaries on what they will do to get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I&#8217;m amazed that a person of your&#8230;um&#8230;experience still apparently holds out some hope that politicians have some boundaries on what they will do to get elected.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

