Giveaways will eventually be too rich

If I had any true ability to see into the future, I wouldn’t be wasting my time maintaining this website for an audience of eight or so. I would have already won the lottery, and I’d have my fanny parked in a beach chair, wondering if 10 a.m. is too early to have a mai tai.

Keep that in mind, then, as I make this prediction: Eventually, one of the challenges to industry-recruitment incentives will succeed.

If you’re a policy wonk you know all about this issue, but if you have an actual life, you may be fuzzy on the details. Here they are: States have become more vigorous over the years in offering tax breaks to companies in the hope of enticing them to build a facility within their borders. North Carolina has had some notable success with this recently, attracting both a Dell computer plant and a Google “server farm.” (I’m done with the explanations. If you don’t know what a “server farm” is, go ask your child.) The rationale behind offering sizable tax breaks — for Google, it was $90 million over 30 years — is that jobs get created. And, of course, the people with those jobs will then pay taxes themselves. Ergo, life is good, at least in theory.

But those tax deals have drawn dissent from people who know their way around a courtroom, specifically the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. It filed a lawsuit opposing the Dell deal, but lost. It’s trying again, this time in hopes of derailing the Google tax giveaway.

It’ll probably lose that one, too, because courts are all about precedent. But at some point, the giveaways will grow so large as competition for industrial plants intensifies that the social gag reflex will kick in. Most of us can live with the knowledge that this country’s tax system is an unruly hodgepodge of breaks and credits, because almost all of us get some kind of benefit from it. Still, at a certain moment in the future a court somewhere will decide that it can no longer ignore the charade that all businesses enjoy equal protection under the law even as state legislatures pass out huge tax breaks to specific companies.

That decision will surely cause enormous upheaval, but good will come of it. Companies will then have to decide to locate somewhere because they like, for instance, the climate.

And no legislature has yet figured out a way to vote a change in the weather.

3 Responses to “Giveaways will eventually be too rich”

  1. Judy Davis Says:

    I don’t know where you got the count of “8 or so” who read your columns but if you did not include me in the count, you can now change it to “9 or so.” I guarantee your count is way off however.

    I’m the one who offered to throw a hissy fit to end all hissy fits when the News & Observer had the audacity to end your columns, but you assured me it would do no good. I’m having the last laugh though because you did the very best thing possible when you departed the N&O. Their loss and my gain — now I can read your words of “wisdom” five days a week. It doesn’t get any better than that. -Judy-

    P.S. I agree with you on the tax incentives.

  2. June Says:

    I’m with Judy….your count can’t be right. I know of at least five people to whom I’ve recommended your site. That puts you up to at least thirteen and probably more.

    As for changing the weather, I heard on the news….or was it the SciFi channel?…. that scientists can now alter the path of hurricanes. If that’s true, I know a few states that could use the rain and some others that could benefit from a “big blow”.

  3. Suburban Kamikaze Says:

    I think when you throw in the SK readers, you could safely go to “12 or so.” I am writing to express my admiration for “social gag reflex,” which I plan to begin using immediately.

    SK

    P.S. Do I really need to know what a server farm is? I do not wish to give my 12-year-old any more reason to feel superior.